Skip to content

Conversation

@mrT23
Copy link
Contributor

@mrT23 mrT23 commented Jun 18, 2025

PR Type

Other


Description

  • Bump Unidecode to version 1.1.2

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Dependencies
requirements.txt
Bump `Unidecode` version                                                                 

requirements.txt

  • Changed Unidecode from 1.1.1 to 1.1.2
+1/-1     

Need help?
  • Type /help how to ... in the comments thread for any questions about PR-Agent usage.
  • Check out the documentation for more information.
  • @github-actions
    Copy link

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 1 🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪
    🧪 No relevant tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    🔀 No multiple PR themes
    ⚡ Recommended focus areas for review

    Version spec syntax

    The new line uses a single '=' and no spaces (Unidecode =1.1.2), which does not conform to pip’s == requirement operator. This will likely cause a parsing error.

    Unidecode =1.1.2
    
    Package naming

    Both text-unidecode and Unidecode are listed; ensure you’re bumping the correct package and that both are actually needed.

    text-unidecode == 1.3
    Unidecode =1.1.2
    

    @github-actions
    Copy link

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    Explore these optional code suggestions:

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Impact
    Possible issue
    Fix version specifier format

    Replace the single equals and missing space with the strict version pin operator ==.
    Pip requires == syntax for exact version specifications.

    requirements.txt [3]

    -Unidecode =1.1.2
    +Unidecode == 1.1.2
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    __

    Why: The current version spec uses a single equals, which is invalid in pip requirements; switching to == 1.1.2 ensures the correct exact version is installed.

    Medium

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

    Labels

    None yet

    Projects

    None yet

    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    2 participants