Added IScheduler.Marshal() #62
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This is to allow the scheduler to ensure you're within an expected execution context, without needing to force a yield if you're already in the expected or desired context This includes major refactoring to collapse the implementation into Scheduler for simplicity. Added unit tests to check behavior of Marshal() and Yield() with respect to threads and the sync context
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is to allow the scheduler to ensure you're within an expected execution context, without needing to force a yield if you're already in the expected or desired context
This includes major refactoring to collapse the implementation into Scheduler for simplicity. Added unit tests to check behavior of Marshal() and Yield() with respect to threads and the sync context
High level of what was changed, possibly include why this approach was taken.
Are there any concerns or areas to be aware of regarding the approach taken or areas changed?