v6 - Card Configuration Alignment

[ozgur00]

Description

This PR implements alignment decisions for Card Configuration. The fields still needing to be determined are not included.

Checklist

• Changes are tested manually

COSDK-792

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @ozgur00, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request refactors the card configuration options to use a more generic FieldMode enum for controlling the visibility of specific fields, specifically Social Security Number and KCP authentication. This change aims to provide a more consistent and maintainable approach to managing field visibility across the card component.

Highlights

• Card Configuration Alignment: This PR focuses on aligning the Card Configuration by introducing FieldMode enum to manage the visibility of Social Security Number and KCP authentication fields.
• FieldMode Enum: Replaces SocialSecurityNumberVisibility and KCPAuthVisibility enums with a unified FieldMode enum for showing or hiding fields.
• Configuration Updates: Updates CardConfiguration and CardConfigurationBuilder to use FieldMode for Social Security Number and KCP authentication visibility settings.
• Parameter Mapping: Adjusts CardComponentParamsMapper to map the new FieldMode settings to the component parameters.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request refactors the card configuration to align property names and consolidate visibility enums into a single FieldMode enum. This is a good step towards consistency. My review focuses on a few remaining inconsistencies in property naming within CardConfigurationBuilder and the internal CardComponentParams class. Addressing these would further improve the alignment and clarity of the configuration API.

[github-actions]

✅ No public API changes

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
0.0% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 80%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud