Skip to content

Add new version of ESM1.6 notebook#4

Merged
micaeljtoliveira merged 13 commits intomainfrom
esm1.6
Oct 24, 2025
Merged

Add new version of ESM1.6 notebook#4
micaeljtoliveira merged 13 commits intomainfrom
esm1.6

Conversation

@micaeljtoliveira
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@micaeljtoliveira micaeljtoliveira marked this pull request as draft October 7, 2025 01:16
@micaeljtoliveira
Copy link
Member Author

@manodeep As discussed this morning, here is my current version of the ESM1.6 notebook.

@micaeljtoliveira
Copy link
Member Author

Note that this requires ACCESS-NRI/access-profiling#11 to run correctly.

@manodeep
Copy link
Collaborator

manodeep commented Oct 8, 2025

@micaeljtoliveira I am now editing the notebook

Copy link
Collaborator

@edoyango edoyango left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Might be a bit premature, but added some suggestions for how to reduce the need for the user to edit things.

@review-notebook-app
Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@@ -0,0 +1,431 @@
{
Copy link
Member Author

@micaeljtoliveira micaeljtoliveira Oct 23, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Line #18.    # Since we have already generated and run *all* the experiments, we

I'll try to fix the code so that this is not necessary any more.


Reply via ReviewNB

@micaeljtoliveira
Copy link
Member Author

@manodeep I think it would be good to rename the notebook file to something more meaningful.

@manodeep manodeep marked this pull request as ready for review October 24, 2025 03:51
@micaeljtoliveira micaeljtoliveira merged commit e2f258c into main Oct 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants