Support for splitting on destination ports #218
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi, thank you for your work. I was missing the option to split the VPN based on destination ports, so this is what i added. The use case is simple, i live in Qatar and things like Facetime are blocked because they do not have a license to operate telecommunication services in the country 🙄. So i added support for the following in the
vpn.confandadd-vpn-iptables-rules.sh:And also matching exemptions for completeness, even though i dont use them:
It's now possible to send specific services like Facetime over VPN while letting everything else go out over the local WAN to avoid latency or other slowdowns caused by VPNs.