Skip to content

Conversation

@varnem2
Copy link

@varnem2 varnem2 commented Aug 22, 2025

Implements proposal from #44

@logseq-cldwalker
Copy link
Contributor

Hi. Thanks for diagnosing and fixing your problem. I'd prefer to not have this be default behavior unless you can point to documentation that lfs checkouts don't slow down or degrade checkouts for anyone else. If you could add add an optional input named checkout-lfs that users can opt-in to, happy to review

@logseq-cldwalker logseq-cldwalker added the awaiting-response Issue will be closed if a reply is not received label Aug 25, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

awaiting-response Issue will be closed if a reply is not received

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants