397 add comments and example pins to help explain proration

[Damonamajor]

Tieback PINs come from the following queries. I put more specified ones regarding the individual PINs in the ‎pipeline/02-assess.R file. I kept the context surrounding decision making to a minimum since some of that will likely change.

SELECT meta_tieback_key_pin,
       meta_pin_num_cards
FROM "model"."assessment_pin"
WHERE run_id = '2025-02-11-charming-eric'
  AND meta_tieback_key_pin IS NOT NULL
  AND meta_tieback_key_pin IN (
      SELECT meta_tieback_key_pin
      FROM "model"."assessment_pin"
      WHERE run_id = '2025-02-11-charming-eric'
        AND meta_tieback_key_pin IS NOT NULL
      GROUP BY meta_tieback_key_pin
      HAVING COUNT(DISTINCT meta_pin_num_cards) > 1
  )
ORDER BY meta_tieback_key_pin, meta_pin_num_cards

select *
from model.assessment_pin
where run_id = '2025-02-11-charming-eric'
and 
flag_land_value_capped = true
and 
meta_tieback_key_pin
 is not null
and meta_tieback_proration_rate < 1

SELECT meta_tieback_key_pin
FROM "model"."assessment_pin"
WHERE run_id = '2025-02-11-charming-eric'
and meta_pin_num_cards > 1
GROUP BY meta_tieback_key_pin
HAVING COUNT(DISTINCT meta_complex_id) > 1

SELECT
  ap.meta_tieback_key_pin,
  ap.meta_pin,
  ap.meta_pin_num_cards,
  ac.meta_card_num,
  ac.char_land_sf
FROM "model"."assessment_pin" ap
JOIN "model"."assessment_card" ac
  ON  ac.meta_pin = ap.meta_pin
  AND ac.run_id   = ap.run_id
WHERE ap.run_id = '2025-02-11-charming-eric'
  AND ap.meta_tieback_key_pin IN ('09263150040000', '09221110050000')
ORDER BY ap.meta_pin, ac.meta_card_num

[Damonamajor]

select meta_tieback_key_pin, meta_pin_num_cards, meta_pin
  FROM "model"."assessment_pin"
  where meta_tieback_key_pin IN ('05283170010000', '01131010080000')
  and run_id = '2025-02-11-charming-eric'

[Damonamajor]

SELECT
  ap.meta_tieback_key_pin,
  ap.meta_pin,
  ap.meta_pin_num_cards,
  ac.meta_card_num,
  ac.char_land_sf
FROM "model"."assessment_pin" ap
JOIN "model"."assessment_card" ac
  ON  ac.meta_pin = ap.meta_pin
  AND ac.run_id   = ap.run_id
WHERE ap.run_id = '2025-02-11-charming-eric'
  AND ap.meta_tieback_key_pin IN ('09263150040000', '09221110050000', '05283170010000', '05283170030000')
ORDER BY ap.meta_pin, ac.meta_card_num

[Damonamajor]

One observation with matching Card values and one with different Card values,

[Damonamajor]

select meta_tieback_key_pin, meta_pin_num_cards, meta_pin, flag_land_value_capped
  FROM "model"."assessment_pin"
  WHERE meta_tieback_key_pin IN ('16012030310000', '29071130320000')
  and run_id = '2025-02-11-charming-eric'

[Damonamajor]

I think this is the only observation which really differs by run_id

[Damonamajor]

select meta_tieback_key_pin, meta_pin_num_cards, meta_pin, meta_complex_id
  FROM "model"."assessment_pin"
  WHERE meta_tieback_key_pin IN ('15213010030000', '30171010230000')
  and run_id = '2025-02-11-charming-eric'