test new branch protection ruleset

[sredxny]

Description

Related Issue

Motivation and Context

How This Has Been Tested

Screenshots (if appropriate)

Types of changes

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist

• Make sure you are requesting to pull a topic/feature/bugfix branch (right side). If pulling from your own
  fork, don't request your master!
• Make sure you are making a pull request against the master branch (left side). Also, you should start
  your branch off our latest master.
• My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • If you've changed APIs, describe what needs to be updated in the documentation.
• I have updated the documentation accordingly.
• Modules and vendor dependencies have been updated; run go mod tidy && go mod vendor
• I have added tests to cover my changes.
• All new and existing tests passed.
• Check your code additions will not fail linting checks:
  • go fmt -s
  • go vet

[probelabs]

This PR appears to test a new branch protection ruleset by introducing minor, non-functional changes.

Files Changed Analysis

• analytics/aggregate.go: A single-line comment has been added. This change is likely intended to trigger the CI/CD pipeline for testing purposes.
• golanglint.xml: A new XML file has been added, which contains a checkstyle report from a linting tool. This suggests that the branch protection rules may involve static analysis checks.

Architecture & Impact Assessment

• Accomplishment: The primary goal of this PR is to validate the recently configured branch protection rules.
• Technical Changes: The changes are superficial and do not alter the application's logic. They consist of a test comment and a linting report file.
• Affected Components: No system components are functionally affected. The changes are relevant only to the repository's CI/CD and branch management workflow.

Scope Discovery & Context Expansion

• The scope of this PR is limited to testing repository settings. The presence of golanglint.xml indicates that the new rules likely enforce code quality standards using a linting tool. The changes are self-contained and do not impact other parts of the codebase.

Metadata

• Review Effort: 1 / 5
• Primary Label: chore

---

Powered by Visor from Probelabs

Last updated: 2025-12-03T20:34:44.436Z | Triggered by: pr_opened | Commit: 1f8ba60

💡 TIP: You can chat with Visor using /visor ask <your question>

[probelabs]

✅ Security Check Passed

No security issues found – changes LGTM.

Architecture Issues (2)

Severity	Location	Issue
🟡 Warning	golanglint.xml:1	Build artifacts, such as this linting report, should not be committed to the version control system. These files are typically generated during a build or CI process and can create unnecessary noise and merge conflicts in the repository's history. 💡 Suggestion Remove `golanglint.xml` from the repository and add a rule to `.gitignore` to ignore XML files to prevent similar files from being committed in the future.
🟡 Warning	analytics/aggregate.go:19	A test comment `// test line` has been added. This seems to be for testing the branch protection rules and should be removed before merging. 💡 Suggestion Remove the comment `// test line`.

✅ Performance Check Passed

No performance issues found – changes LGTM.

Quality Issues (2)

Severity	Location	Issue
🟡 Warning	analytics/aggregate.go:19	The added comment `// test line` appears to be temporary and for testing purposes. Such comments should be removed before merging to keep the codebase clean. 💡 Suggestion Remove the temporary comment.
🟡 Warning	golanglint.xml:1	Build artifacts and linter reports like `golanglint.xml` should not be committed to the version control system. These files are typically generated by CI/CD pipelines and can create unnecessary merge conflicts. They should be added to the `.gitignore` file instead. 💡 Suggestion Remove `golanglint.xml` from the repository and add `golanglint.xml` to the `.gitignore` file.

---

Powered by Visor from Probelabs

Last updated: 2025-12-03T20:34:47.278Z | Triggered by: pr_opened | Commit: 1f8ba60

💡 TIP: You can chat with Visor using /visor ask <your question>

[github-actions]

🚨 Jira Linter Failed

Commit: 1f8ba60
Failed at: 2025-12-03 20:34:26 UTC

The Jira linter failed to validate your PR. Please check the error details below:

🔍 Click to view error details

failed to validate branch and PR title rules: branch name 'test-branch-protection-rulesets' must contain a valid Jira ticket ID (e.g., ABC-123)

Next Steps

• Ensure your branch name contains a valid Jira ticket ID (e.g., ABC-123)
• Verify your PR title matches the branch's Jira ticket ID
• Check that the Jira ticket exists and is accessible

---

This comment will be automatically deleted once the linter passes.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud