Value of gravx #382
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
Hello, You can check the 2D cavity for an example of a buoyant flow : https://github.com/xcompact3d/Incompact3d/blob/master/examples/Cavity/input_2D_LR_Re14084.i3d The exact definition of dimensionless numbers (such as richardson) is case-specific. In the example above, the gravity vector has a unit length yes. Cheers, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Incompact3d/src/transeq.f90
Line 776 in 519d615
In this line the term richardson already contains gravity value g=9.81 m/s2. So the gravx value should be put as -1 if my flow is upward along x direction and buoyancy is acting in the negative x direction? We should not use -9.81 as gravx value, as richardson already contains g=9.81? Is it correct?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions