Skip to content

Check with NLSY about Dataverse #61

@wibeasley

Description

@wibeasley

See if they have preferences, conventions, or advice for https://dataverse.org/, or something similar.

From what I've read so far, the data citation documentation seems to be more suited for repositories of original datasources that the research collects, as opposed to derivative datasources, like our NLSY Kinship links.

The archived applied papers can have datasets (like this one), but I don't see an explicit link back to the original BLS source. That example has a README file that gives credit to the NLSY, but I don't see anything special in the structured metadata that could help with metrics of NLSY popularity.

@smasongarrison, I cc'd you on my recent email to them. Have you done anything like this?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions