important bug in jec uncertainty

[ipozdnyakov]

lines 266-267 in CommonFSQFramework/Core/src/JetView.cc

m_jecUnc->setJetEta(rec.eta());
m_jecUnc->setJetPt(rec.eta());

this overestimates uncertainty due-to setting low numerucal values of eta as values of pt

[hvanhaev]

Dear Ivan, Sorry for the late reply, but thank you for spotting this! Do you have a more appropriate solution implemented? We too in Antwerp are just starting to get to know all the jet related things in the CFF, previously this was only mainly used by Tomasz. Cheers, Hans On 04 Dec 2016, at 20:42, Ivan <notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com>> wrote: lines 266-267 in CommonFSQFramework/Core/src/JetView.cc<http://JetView.cc> m_jecUnc->setJetEta(rec.eta()); m_jecUnc->setJetPt(rec.eta()); this overestimates uncertainty due-to setting low numerucal values of eta as values of pt — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#29>, or mute the thread<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEgkF5Ypuly63Fi-rv6Kx3ZdKzPpPme6ks5rExeLgaJpZM4LDrHN>.