-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 376
Open
Description
In my gulp task, I'd liked to do something like this.
.pipe(
$.if(!isProd, sass.sync({
outputStyle: 'expanded',
precision: 6,
includePaths: module.paths,
disableDeprecationWarnings: true
}))
.on('error', sass.logError))module.paths is a predefined variable containing all the node_modules search paths to find installed packages. It returns already an array in the current form:
[
'/Volumes/Code/customer/project/styleguide/node_modules',
'/Volumes/Code/customer/project/node_modules',
'/Volumes/Code/customer/node_modules',
'/Volumes/Code/node_modules',
'/Volumes/node_modules',
'/node_modules'
]This hasn't worked as expected, so I had to convert it to a string instead.
let incPath = module.paths.join(',');Then I passed that into my sass compile task.
.pipe(
$.if(!isProd, sass.sync({
outputStyle: 'expanded',
precision: 6,
includePaths: incPath,
disableDeprecationWarnings: true
}))
.on('error', sass.logError))I guess I found the issue here:
Lines 122 to 134 in c04bb67
| // Ensure file's parent directory in the include path | |
| if (opts.includePaths) { | |
| if (typeof opts.includePaths === 'string') { | |
| opts.includePaths = [opts.includePaths]; | |
| } | |
| } else { | |
| opts.includePaths = []; | |
| } | |
| opts.includePaths.unshift(path.dirname(file.path)); | |
| // Generate Source Maps if the source-map plugin is present |
It only checks for strings rather than for a path array. Is it safe to submit a PR for this change, or is there any reason more technical reason behind the check for the string story?
Happy to contribute this small adjustment.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels