You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hey just want to let you know that there are active users (at least one) of your CFG Flux pipeline, and being able to do 2 parallel forward passes would be extermely appreciated. And possibly not the right place for it, but if runware supported true cfg for Flux Dev, that'd be super amazing (since you already have the custom pipeline in ST).
Another thing is more of a question -- alternative schedulers for flux are not supported in diffusers still, and it doesn't seem like a prio -- this issue has been stale for a long time: huggingface/diffusers#9607. The question is whether we just have to wait for diffusers' support or perhaps there's a 3rd party implementation that can be ported into the custom pipeline?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hey just want to let you know that there are active users (at least one) of your CFG Flux pipeline, and being able to do 2 parallel forward passes would be extermely appreciated. And possibly not the right place for it, but if runware supported true cfg for Flux Dev, that'd be super amazing (since you already have the custom pipeline in ST).
Another thing is more of a question -- alternative schedulers for flux are not supported in diffusers still, and it doesn't seem like a prio -- this issue has been stale for a long time: huggingface/diffusers#9607. The question is whether we just have to wait for diffusers' support or perhaps there's a 3rd party implementation that can be ported into the custom pipeline?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions