Proposal: Scalable Architecture Strategy (Dev vs. Prod) & UI Standards #59
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
|
@CodeByRachit various approaches are possible. Please make sure to explain and justify your approach in your proposal itself. Especially for a new project such as BHV, this is critical. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@pradeeban Understood Sir. Thank you for the clarification. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi @pradeeban @mdxabu
Regarding the recent feedback about the missing base structure and the directive to "work on code":
I have been analyzing the project's requirements for the upcoming GSoC period. My current PRs (Beehive 2.0 & UI Overhaul) propose a specific architectural foundation, and I want to ensure this aligns with your long-term vision before I optimize further.
Proposal: I can refactor the backend to strictly use an ORM (SQLAlchemy) that supports a "Dual-Database" strategy: using SQLite for local development (speed/ease) and PostgreSQL for production (reliability).
Question: Does this approach align with your scalability plans, or do you have a different stack preference (e.g., Django)?
Proposal: If this design language is approved, I can focus on documenting the CSS variables and component structure now. This would effectively create a "Design System" for other GSoC students to reuse, preventing UI fragmentation as the project grows.
I am eager to finalize these foundational choices (Stack & Design) so the codebase is robust and ready for rapid feature development during the coding period.
Looking forward to your guidance!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions