forked from COSIMA/cice5
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Open
Description
So far we've been using jobnum > 1 and runtype="continue". The access driver initialises the model differently, when jobnum=1:
cice5/drivers/access/CICE_InitMod.F90
Lines 159 to 164 in 0bd0131
| idate_save = idate !save for late re-set in case 'restart' is used for jobnum=1 | |
| !and mess up the calendar idate for this exp...! | |
| if (jobnum==1) then | |
| nrec = month - 1 !month is from calendar | |
| if (nrec == 0) nrec = 12 | |
| call get_time0_sstsss(trim(inputdir)//'/monthly_sstsss.nc', nrec) |
cice5/drivers/access/CICE_InitMod.F90
Lines 189 to 194 in 0bd0131
| if (jobnum == 1 ) then | |
| time = 0.0 !NOTE, the first job must be set back to 0 and | |
| idate = idate_save !idate back to the 'initial' value, in any case | |
| else !BX: 20160720 | |
| time = runtime0 !............ | |
| endif |
The restart/initialisation method when jobnum=1 is not very clear, and as noted here the runtype setting can be changed independently of jobnum. It would good to investigate how the code is behaving, and whether problems can occur from inconsistent runtype, jobnum and calendar settings.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels