Pupcloud in docker will not show (in browser) content of files < 512b (bytes)

[marioscube]

When trying to show a file in a browser that is smaller than 512 bytes, the content will not be shown.

511b.txt
512b.txt

I do not know if this is a pupcloud or docker limitation (i fear the last).

[DarrenPIngram]

Could you fire up a quick install of filebrowser and see if that displays the file? Rules out Docker if so (if it worked). I'd check for you but not by a machine to start moving stuff with ease.

…

On Tue, 17 May 2022 at 12:36, marioscube ***@***.***> wrote: When trying to show a file in a browser that is smaller than 512 bytes, the content will not be shown. [image: Screenshot 2022-05-17 at 11 33 15] <https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/20281601/168779771-d6d552cc-2ec3-4ea2-b0a1-8eb57fd1d2ae.png> 511b.txt <https://github.com/proofrock/pupcloud/files/8707079/511b.txt> 512b.txt <https://github.com/proofrock/pupcloud/files/8707081/512b.txt> I do not know if this is a pupcloud or docker limitation (i fear the last). — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#49>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABV5MAEPENHIXWGXBZLFPY3VKNSATANCNFSM5WEI3H5A> . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[marioscube]

Installed filebrowser in docker.......... Not very logical installation.

In filebrowser I can "view" the 511b file.
However I have the impression that filebrowser does NOT work the same as pupcloud.

I cannot rule out Docker.

[proofrock]

The file is there, but the mime type resolution fails. I use the internal Golang routines, that already gave proof not to be the most reliable of all (I even wrote it in the README). In our case, I suspect it offloads resolution to the operating system, that of course inside Docker is a different one (Alpine Linux) and may fail. It's strange that it happens only for <512bytes... anyway. Two possible solutions:

• revert to mime type resolution only based on file extension
• adopt a "more regular" linux distro for the docker image, but this would make for a huge image

...I have to re-check the go routines, however; I'll open a ticket in Go's language issue tracker to get more details.

[DarrenPIngram]

Dunno. It seemed ok here. Taken from an old file with commented out options # filebrowser5: # container_name: filebrowser5 # restart: unless-stopped # ports: # - "2053:80" # volumes: # - /home/capture-au/folder1:/srv # - /home/capture-au/filebrowser-config/filebrowser5.db:/database.db # - /home/capture-au/filebrowser-config/filebrowser.json:/.filebrowser.json # - /etc/letsencrypt/live/a1.blackjackanderson.download/fullchain.pem:/fullchain.pem # - /etc/letsencrypt/live/a1.blackjackanderson.download/privkey.pem:/privkey.pem # image: filebrowser/filebrowser Can't say about underlying system differences. —- Via iPad. Hopefully with not too many typos.

…

On 17. May 2022, at 14.46, marioscube ***@***.***> wrote:  Installed filebrowser in docker.......... Not very logical installation. In filebrowser I can "view" the 511b file. However I have the impression that filebrowser does NOT work the same as pupcloud. I cannot rule out Docker. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you commented.

[proofrock]

Can't say about underlying system differences.

See my explanation above

[DarrenPIngram]

Yes, think our messages crossed. I don't pretend to know what fb is written in. —- Via iPad. Hopefully with not too many typos.

…

On 17. May 2022, at 14.53, Germano Rizzo ***@***.***> wrote:  Can't say about underlying system differences. See my explanation above — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you commented.

[proofrock]

In Go. But probably it simply uses a different resolution method.